Skip to main content

How Do We Keep Guns Away from "Bad Guys?"

Submitted by markfern on

“The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”  So said NRA President Wayne LaPierre just after the Sandy Hook massacre.  If a ‘bad guy’ pulls out a gun and starts shooting, the only answer, according to Mr. LaPierre, is for someone to pull out another gun and take the ‘bad guy’ out.

The NRA and the Republican Party advocate what they call “Constitutional carry”—allowing anyone to carry a gun, openly or concealed, at any time and anywhere (excluding, one presumes, people with felony convictions).  Republicans all over the country are attacking background checks, gun-free zones, and laws that require a permit to carry a loaded, concealed weapon.

The Democratic Party approach is different; it focuses on preventing people likely to misuse guns from getting them in the first place.  The background check law has stopped over 1.5 million ‘bad guys’ from buying guns since 1994.  That law passed after a Republican filibuster failed.

Unfortunately, our background check system has a couple of glaring loopholes. It does not cover sales of guns by unlicensed sellers at gun shows or sales between private parties, so any ‘bad guy’ who wants to buy a gun has an easy workaround. 

Republicans have repeatedly blocked efforts by Democrats to require a background check for all gun sales.  Republicans seem to value easy access to guns over a system that would keep guns out of the hands of felons and people with severe mental disabilities.

This is not about Constitutional rights. Background checks and concealed carry permits are Constitutional.   In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the US Supreme Court ruled that citizens have a Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.  Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, explained that the right to bear arms is limited:  It is not “a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”  Justice Scalia specifically referenced prior court decisions that upheld restrictions or bans on carrying concealed, loaded weapons.

For 94 years, New Hampshire has required a permit to carry a loaded, concealed weapon in a car or on your person.  The permits are issued by the chiefs of police in each city and town.  The law states that permits can be issued to “a suitable person to be licensed.”  

Our chiefs of police have taken their responsibility seriously, seeking out the record and the reputation of those applying for a concealed carry permit.  Sometimes an applicant is an irresponsible citizen who is not suitable for a permit:  a person who has a history of getting drunk in bars and picking fights; a person who has threatened someone with a gun in the past, though never convicted of a felony; a person who has been involved in road rage incidents; a person who has been the subject of multiple domestic violence calls to 911.

Under current law, if a person has committed an act of violence below the felony level, it is legal for that person to have a gun at home.  But if that person wants to carry a loaded concealed weapon in public, New Hampshire has a higher standard implemented by our chiefs of police.

The State Senate and the House have now passed SB12, which eliminates the requirement for a permit to carry a concealed loaded weapon.  In the Senate, the ten Democrats were the only no votes.  Thirteen Republicans voted yes.  The vote in the House was nearly as lopsided.  Only two Republicans voted no, and only ten Democrats voted yes. 

The effect of SB12 is to remove the discretion of chiefs of police to deny permits.  Republicans talk about law and order; they should trust the chiefs of police to exercise good judgment in determining who should be allowed to carry a loaded, concealed weapon.  This is what Republicans and the NRA have now abolished.

The New Hampshire Association of Chiefs of Police spoke out against SB12.  Their arguments fell on deaf ears.  The Governor has indicated he will sign SB12. 

If you have a chance to speak to your Representative or Senator or the Governor, ask these questions:  Should an alcoholic with multiple DWI convictions be allowed to carry a loaded concealed weapon?  How about the man who punched his neighbor during an argument?  Or the woman who has been diagnosed a paranoid schizophrenic, and sometimes fails to take her meds?

Once Republicans have succeeded in passing SB12, almost anybody could be carrying a loaded, concealed weapon—even people with violent histories.  And our only defense, in this Republican world, will be to avoid the first shot, and try to return fire.